Any objective observer of the situation in the United States can see that President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, the ‘New Right’, and various oligarchs have steered the country towards autocracy. The only question will be how far down the road of dictatorial rule does the country actually get. Like it or not, the world’s lone superpower taking an autocratic turn affects all of us. Whether you are in Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, Asia, or the Middle East; the aftershocks from America’s tremors will be felt.
In a general sense, this means we are entering a time of lessening freedom, and increasing threats against it. As autocracy increases, freedom must retreat; and vice versa - the two things cannot coexist. For artists, this dynamic goes straight to the heart of their very being. Making art doesn’t necessarily require freedom per say. But the act of making art is an act of freedom in itself.
In historian Tim Snyder’s recent book On Freedom he describes five components that make up what he describes as ‘positive freedom’: sovereignty, unpredictability, mobility, factuality, and solidarity. Sovereignty refers to an individual's capacity to understand the world sufficiently to the point they can make informed judgments and take action. Unpredictability refers to the capacity for individuals to act creatively, and in ways that are not predetermined.
Mobility describes the capacity for individuals to move through the world according to their desires; as well as social mobility. Factuality refers to knowing the truth about the world, which then enables individuals to change it. And solidarity refers to the recognition of the interconnectedness of all individuals, and how freedom is collective and interdependent.
All acts of art-making embody some of these qualities. While works of art that directly seek to challenge autocratic beliefs embody most, if not all of them. These types of works also convey authentic feeling and meaning. That is to say they occupy the necessary space that lies in direct opposition to autocratic sentiments. A space where human dignity, and universal rights are treated with earnest belief. In the art world this is no small feat considering earnest feeling is sometimes greeted with cynicism or accusations of kitchiness.
Two artists whose work functions as a direct challenge to autocracy are Barbara Kruger and Ai Weiwei. Both Kruger and Ai have used artistic expression to highlight the importance of freedom, and interrogate those that restrict it. Kruger’s work Untitled (Your Body is a Battleground) was created for the 1989 Women’s March on Washington. It was a direct message to women everywhere that their bodily freedom was being encroached upon by external forces. It was an act of freedom that sought to enable greater freedom for others. Through maximal use of factuality and solidarity, Kruger was able to create a work that became a timeless touchstone for women’s rights.
Much of Ai Weiwei’s artistic practice has been shaped by autocratic restrictions on freedom, and the opposition to it. His continued artistic expression in the face of autocratic harassment by the Chinese Communist Party government embodies freedom in itself. Creating art when an oppressive force tells you not to displays sovereignty, unpredictability, and mobility. Ai would then use factuality and solidarity to create works like Trace, or films like So Sorry. Created while Ai was under house arrest, Trace was a direct rebuke to autocratic abuse. Ai created dozens of earnest portraits out of legos of other political prisoners from around the world. For Ai, it was a tribute to the ‘heroes of our time’. Again, this mode of art making that directly takes aim at autocracy must be wrapped in authentic feeling and meaning.
For his film So Sorry, Ai sought to document his attempt to identify the names of students killed during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Thousands of children died due to poor building construction and laxed inspections. Both of which were a direct result of the corruption embedded within the autocratic Chinese government. Ai’s film displayed factuality (the desire to show the truth about the earthquake) and solidarity (the desire to convey the human dignity of those that died). It is no mistake that Ai’s actions led to him being assaulted by Chinese state police. Autocratic regimes recognize that the greatest threats to their rule come from those who engage in the elements of true freedom.
While both Ai and Kruger have made works that embody the best of positive freedom, their success has also allowed them to reap the benefits from an economic system that could be best described as unfettered capitalism. Unfettered capitalism, otherwise known as late stage capitalism, describes the economic situation we find ourselves in today. A time where excessive money making by corporations, economic inequality, spiraling cost of living, and unchecked consumerism have taken hold.
To the best of my knowledge, neither Ai or Kruger have used their work for purely financial gain, or catered their production towards capitalistic ends. However, the same cannot be said for much of the art world in terms of avoiding complete capitulation to the excesses of unfettered capitalism. The question then becomes, in a time of rising autocracy; does art that aligns itself with excessive profiteering become an unwitting accessory to freedom's autocratic demise?
Unfettered capitalism might not be the binary opposite of freedom, but it definitely stands in opposition. In relation to the five components of freedom mentioned earlier, it restricts all of them for many. It curtails the sovereignty of individuals by keeping quality child care, healthcare, or decent education out of reach. It stifles unpredictability by trapping individuals in meaningless work; or allowing social media companies to render them predictable through seductive digital algorithms.
Within unfettered capitalism, mobility (whether social or physical) is eroded by economic inequality and limited resources. While factuality gives way to conspiracy, falsehoods, and shortened attention spans as big tech companies make billions off of manipulating the human mind. Finally, and probably most importantly, solidarity ceases to exist as unfettered capitalism stirs greed and egoism. Both of which cause individuals to think primarily of themselves, and ignore the humanity of those around them. This is probably the most pernicious effect of excessive capitalism. For a system that spurs human beings to be ruled by their base impulses is a system that doesn’t enable freedom, but servitude.
It’s hard to deny, given all this, that art commodified or produced according to the norms of unfettered capitalism engages with a system that runs parallel to autocracy. Therefore, art that is intended to oppose injustice, oppression, or authoritarianism cannot be given away to the whims of economic excess. Art that is intended to elevate human dignity cannot be turned into a commodity without turning the subject of the art into a commodity as well. When a work of art becomes a commodity it becomes no different than a treasury bond or a corporate stock item. And when the metaphysical waters around a work of art begin to resemble those that govern Wall Street, one cannot honestly say that it maintains any kind of purchase on conveying true freedom.
In an age of increasing autocracy, and lessening freedom, art can act as a stubborn reminder of what is right, and what is true. Since autocracy is the antithesis of freedom, any work of art that seeks to stand in opposition to autocracy must embody freedom itself. This means it must be authentic in purpose, authentic in human feeling, and oriented towards the universal. Freedom is important because it is a universal right that all human beings deserve. It is not something that some human beings deserve upon birth, while others do not. That kind of discriminatory thinking is why autocracy is evil at its essence.
In the past, as artists, we might have taken these notions for granted, hand waved them away, or even greeted them with cynicism. Yet what might not have been clear then, should be clear now. The stuff we might sometimes regard as kitschy, naïve, or overly earnest; that’s actually the stuff that matters. And in the end it will be the only stuff that can truly hold the line in the face of advancing autocracy and declining freedom.